Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Šenov

IČO 00297291

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Buyer supports competition by providing extended deadlines for tender submissions.

49.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

71%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zvýšení kapacity ZŠ Šenov
Stavební úpravy školních budov
18
Ø5 in industry
Svoz odpadu pro Město Šenov
Sběr odpadu
2
Ø2 in industry
Svoz odpadu pro Město Šenov
Sběr odpadu
2
Ø2 in industry
Výstavba chodníku a dešťové kanalizace ul. Václavovická, Šenov
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
7
Ø5 in industry
MŠ ŠENOV – ZAJIŠTĚNÍ ÚSPORY ENERGIÍ, MŠ LAPAČKA
Stavební úpravy budov mateřských škol
1
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

64%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
OZO Ostrava s.r.o.
2 19,686,253
BYSTROŇ Group a.s.
1 15,885,857
JANKOSTAV s.r.o.
1 8,132,358
INTOZA s.r.o.
1 8,077,187
BDSTAV MORAVA s.r.o.
1 7,756,081
Other suppliers 1 5,979,627

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

87%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 75% (3 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 25% (1 from 4)
E-auction 25% (1 from 4)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

72%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 158,036,468
Unregulated purchases 149,435,856
Total 307,472,324

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

62%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 2.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

93%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 14% (1 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 7)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)