Hospitals • 2015

Fakultní nemocnice Ostrava

IČO 00843989

Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts. Procurement jounal notices do not contain many mistakes.

11.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

48%
average 57%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Modernizace a obnova přístrojového vybavení včetně technického zázemí KOC FN Ostrava – Radioterapeutický ozařovací přístroj s příslušenstvím
Lineární urychlovače
2
Ø2 in industry
Léčivé přípravky IV.
Léčivé přípravky a zdravotnické prostředky
2
Ø3 in industry
Zateplení Diagnostického komplementu FNO
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Perorální cytostatikum Afinitor tbl. s obsahovou látkou Everolimusum
Různé léčivé přípravky
3
Ø2 in industry
Poskytování pozáručních servisních služeb pro lineární urychlovač SYNERGY a PRECISE
Opravy a údržba zdravotnických přístrojů
1
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

91%
average 69%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Phoenix lékárenský velkoobchod, a.s.
9 122,272,876
Amedis, spol. s r.o.
1 66,528,500
Transmedic International s.r.o.
1 64,716,000
Bystroň Group a.s.
3 58,791,038
Alliance Healthcare s.r.o.
3 56,085,304
Other suppliers 127 597,596,797

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

81%
average 82%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 30% (21 from 71)
Nonprice competition 3% (2 from 71)
Lots 30% (21 from 71)
E-auction 4% (3 from 71)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

38%
average 45%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,000,192,574
Unregulated purchases 5,786,060,926
Total 6,786,253,500

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

71%
average 78%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

56%
average 53%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 13%
Cancelled contracts 20%
Average requirements modifications count 0.49

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 146)
Final or estimated price not published 1% (1 from 146)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 146)
Missing supplier ID 12% (17 from 146)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 146)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 146)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 146)
Missing call for tenders 1% (2 from 146)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

46%
average 45%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 83% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.76 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

92%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 146)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 2% (3 from 146)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 146)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 146)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 146)
Supplier donating to political party 1% (1 from 146)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 18% (26 from 146)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

25%
average 33%

Conditional disclosure

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.