Government • 2015

Národní Divadlo

IČO 00023337

The competition for contracts is low. Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..).

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

35%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Generální oprava fasád historické budovy Národního divadla - II. etapa - vícepráce
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace
1
Ø4 in industry
Generální oprava fasád historické budovy Národního divadla - II. etapa - vícepráce
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace
1
Ø4 in industry
Generální oprava fasád historické budovy Národního divadla
Historicky nebo architektonicky mimořádně zajímavé budovy
7
Ø4 in industry
ND - Rekonstrukce a zateplení střešního pláště historické a provozní budovy Stavovského divadla - vícepráce
Stavba střešních konstrukcí a pokládka střešních krytin a pomocné práce
1
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce a zateplení střešního pláště historické budovy Stavovského divadla
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

50%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Ohl Žs, a.s.
3 250,988,629
Stamo, s.r.o.
6 80,479,958
H & B delta, s.r.o.
2 45,702,954
Art Lighting Production, s.r.o.
1 18,327,119
Lumius, spol. s r.o.
2 15,177,306
Other suppliers 23 86,654,150

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

65%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 499,166,219
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 684,118,658
Total 1,183,284,876

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

73%
average 61%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

73%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 8%
Cancelled contracts 9%
Average requirements modifications count 0.45

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

32%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 37)
Final or estimated price not published 65% (24 from 37)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 37)
Missing supplier ID 22% (8 from 37)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 37)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 37)
Missing call for tenders 3% (1 from 37)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 37)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 37)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

9%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 13% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.08 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

83%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 37)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 37)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 5% (2 from 37)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 37)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 37)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 37)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 27% (10 from 37)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 56%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.