Government • 2015

Česká geologická služba

IČO 00025798

Good buyer. Buyer publishes without flaws in procurement journal. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

10.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

71%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Průzkumné vrtné práce v Oblasti 3
Geologický, geofyzikální a jiný vědecký průzkum
2
Ø2 in industry
Průzkumné vrtné práce v Oblasti 1
Geologický, geofyzikální a jiný vědecký průzkum
3
Ø2 in industry
Průzkumné vrtné práce v Oblasti 2
Geologický, geofyzikální a jiný vědecký průzkum
3
Ø2 in industry
Geologické práce pro hydrogeologický průzkum Oblast 3
Oceánografické a hydrologické služby
2
Ø2 in industry
Karotážní práce v Oblastech 1 až 3
Karotážní měření zapažení vrtů
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

69%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Baugeo, s.r.o.
3 82,426,796
Vodní Zdroje, a.s.
2 53,935,075
Aquatest a.s.
3 48,910,580
Geotest, a.s.
3 15,368,000
Geophysik GGD mbH
0 13,048,420
Other suppliers 20 64,165,422

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 278,811,673
Zakazky maleho rozsahu 0
Unregulated purchases 323,298,252
Total 602,109,926

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

90%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Puvodni zakazka (Kč) Zmena zavazku / JRBU (Kč)
Podniková licence na software Esri
Not disclosed
- 7,000,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

54%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 4%
Cancelled contracts 40%
Average requirements modifications count 0.15

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 32)
Final or estimated price not published 3% (1 from 32)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 32)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 32)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 32)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 32)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 32)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 32)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 32)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

57%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 68% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.67 (average mistakes per contract)
Uveřejňují se na profilu zakázky malého rozsahu? (Poměřujeme proti počtu zakázek v režimu zákona)
0-250K 0 zakázek
250K-500K 0 zakázek
500K-1000K 0 zakázek
1000K+ 0 zakázek

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

81%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 3% (1 from 32)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 16% (5 from 32)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 3% (1 from 32)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 32)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 32)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 32)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (4 from 32)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 56%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.