Government • 2015

Generální finanční ředitelství

IČO 72080043

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

62%
average 61%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

61%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Ibm Česká republika, spol. s r.o.
29 1,094,259,187
Notes Cs a.s.
4 566,642,348
Pražská energetika, a.s.
1 96,904,414
Syscom Software spol. s r.o.
6 94,713,176
Vema,a.s.
5 92,802,888
Other suppliers 98 726,243,627

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 80% (4 from 5)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 5)
Lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

65%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 2,677,629,428
Unregulated purchases 3,637,826,735
Total 6,315,456,163

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

5%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
ADIS - realizace aplikačního modulu IS ADIS pro nezbytné úpravy podle zákona č. 456/2011 Sb., o Finanční správě České republiky
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
166,651,589
Zajištění aplikačního modulu IS ADIS pro 2. fázi úprav podle zákona č. 456/2011 Sb., o Finanční správě České republiky
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
100,560,594
Zajštění aplikačních modulů IS ADIS - zavedení legislativních a procesních změn
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
90,778,976
ADIS-Zajištění aplikačního modulu IS ADIS pro zavedení systému M1SS
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
82,601,568
Pozáruční servis hardware ADIS
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
75,004,682

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

33%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 33%
Cancelled contracts 28%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

19%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 1% (2 from 147)
Final or estimated price not published 24% (35 from 147)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 147)
Missing supplier ID 8% (12 from 147)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 147)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 147)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 147)
Missing call for tenders 24% (35 from 147)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

24%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 24% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.06 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

96%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 147)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 147)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 147)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 147)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 147)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 147)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (18 from 147)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

50%
average 56%

Conditional disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.