Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Terezín

IČO 00264474

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts.

11.
ranking
78%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

53%
average 49%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

53%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
ID Stavby group s.r.o.
4 108,437,359
Čermák a Hrachovec a.s.
1 73,898,578
Sdružení Terezín 2016 ,Metrostav a.s., – vedoucí společník sdružení a Vodohospodářské stavby, společnost s ručením omezeným – další společník sdružení
3 32,659,622
Vodohospodářská stavební spol. s r. o.
1 14,742,681
Gardenline s.r.o.
2 13,483,869
Other suppliers 9 18,263,246

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 67% (2 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Division into lots 50% (2 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 4)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

85%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 285,751,444
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 112,305,611
Total 398,057,055

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Revitalizace přístupů k rekonstruovaným budovám IOP v Terezíně - Parkoviště u Retranchementu 5 - vícepráce 1
Additional works
- 1,645,499

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 2.25

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

84%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 14% (1 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 14% (1 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 7)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 7)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 7)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

82%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.71 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 7 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders