Small cities • 2016

Město Dačice

IČO 00246476

Good buyer. Procurement jounal notices do not contain many mistakes. The competition for contracts is high.

53.
ranking
76%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

65%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Výstavba ZTV sídliště rodinných domů v lokalitě Za Školou v Dačicích
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
5
Ø5 in industry
Přístavba domu s pečovatelskou službou v Dačicích
Výstavba domů s pečovatelskou službou
9
Ø6 in industry
Modernizace ČOV Dačice
Čistírny odpadních vod
5
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení Základní školy a gymnázia
Stavební úpravy školních budov
2
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektů MŠ a ZŠ v Bratrské ulicic v Dačicích
Stavební úpravy budov mateřských škol
10
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

53%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Swietelsky stavební s.r.o.
1 38,623,317
Jemnická Stavba, a.s.
2 27,593,620
Aqua - Styl spol. s r.o.
1 8,564,380
Korint stavební spol. s r. o.
1 3,765,097
Acg-real s.r.o.
1 3,044,989
Other suppliers 6 11,755,093

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

89%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 2.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

96%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 25% (3 from 12)
Final or estimated price not published 25% (3 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 12)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 12)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

87%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 12)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier donating to political party 8% (1 from 12)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 17% (2 from 12)