Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Dačice

IČO 00246476

Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

34.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

28%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Každý má právo na vzdělání - Mateřská škola Za Lávkami
Construction work for kindergarten buildings
2
Ø5 in industry
Výstavba hasičské zbrojnice pro SDH Dačice
Fire station construction work
11
Ø6 in industry
Zateplení Základní školy a gymnázia

2
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce místních komunikací v lokalitě Peráček v Dačicích - I. etapa

7
Ø7 in industry
Vodovod Hostkovice - Lipolec
Works related to water-distribution pipelines
8
Ø7 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

47%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Spilka a Říha s.r.o.
1 41,999,808
Staving Studená, spol. s.r.o.
1 12,238,067
SATES ČECHY s.r.o.
2 11,534,612
Jemnická Stavba, a.s.
1 7,830,130
VHST s.r.o.
1 6,746,885
Other suppliers 1 3,044,989

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 67% (2 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

61%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 165,865,870
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 282,876,661
Total 448,742,531

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 8)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 8)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 8)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

78%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 88% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.38 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 8 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders