State-owned enterprises • 2015

Vodovody a kanalizace Pardubice, a.s.

IČO 60108631

There are not many contract extensions and ammendments. Court deemed all complaints against buyer invalid or insignificant.

25.
ranking
69%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

57%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Dodávka vody předané
Pitná voda
neuveden
Ø5 in industry
Skupinový vodovod Holicko
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
LIKVIDACE ODPADNÍ VODY S OBSAHEM KALU Z BČOV V PARDUBICÍCH
Čištění odpadních vod
2
Ø5 in industry
Kanalizace a ČOV Horní Jelení, číslo projektu: CZ.1.02/1.1.00/12.15533
Stavební práce
9
Ø5 in industry
Dodávka elektrické energie
Elektrická energie
4
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

52%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Vodárenská společnost Chrudim, a.s.
1 211,250,000
Vces a.s.
1 178,895,118
Marius Pedersen a.s.
1 136,824,750
Agrostav Pardubice, akciová společnost
1 28,726,332
Ep Energy Trading, a.s.
2 8,386,448
Other suppliers 14 27,204,714

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 20% (1 from 5)
Nonprice competition 20% (1 from 5)
Lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

72%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 591,287,363
Unregulated purchases 544,771,637
Total 1,136,059,000

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

94%
average 73%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

59%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 13%
Cancelled contracts 25%
Average requirements modifications count 0.38

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

80%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 15% (3 from 20)
Final or estimated price not published 40% (8 from 20)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 20)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 20)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 20)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 20)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 20)
Missing call for tenders 10% (2 from 20)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

38%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.95 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

89%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 20)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier donating to political party 5% (1 from 20)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 20)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.