Small cities • 2016

Město Lanškroun

IČO 00279102

Good buyer. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

11.
ranking
84%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

63%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Výstavba Sběrního dvora Lanškroun
Stavební práce
1
Ø5 in industry
Varovný systém Města a ORP Lanškroun
Prevence záplav
3
Ø3 in industry
Technická a dopravní infrastruktura Za Střelnicí II, Lanškroun - II. etapa
Práce pro kompletní nebo částečnou výstavbu inženýrské stavitelství
9
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy objektu č. p. 33
Stavební montážní práce
12
Ø4 in industry
Revitalizace zámecké zahrady
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

85%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Profistav Litomyšl, a.s.
1 8,828,041
Master It Technologies, a.s.
1 7,496,622
Agile spol. s r.o.
1 6,888,458
Vemex s.r.o.
1 6,540,525
Ing. Pavel Kafka
1 5,999,999
Other suppliers 11 35,727,190

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

64%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Final or estimated price not published 12% (2 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing supplier ID 12% (2 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 16)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 25% (4 from 16)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

88%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 16)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 6% (1 from 16)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 19% (3 from 16)