Government • 2015

Hasičský záchranný sbor Jihomoravského kraje

IČO 70884099

The competition for contracts is high. Relatively small fraction of purchases is spent according to law.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

82%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Mikulov PS - výstavba nové požární stanice
Výstavba požárních stanic
9
Ø5 in industry
Dispoziční řešení objektu HZS Jihomoravského kraje - Brno, Líšeň, Zaoralova 3
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
PS LÍŠEŇ – REKONSTRUKCE AREÁLU II. - SOUHRN AKCÍ
Výstavba požárních stanic
6
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce Zařízení Tišnov
Rekonstrukce budov
5
Ø5 in industry
Technické zhodnocení AZ 30 IVECO MAGIRUS
Přebudování a generální opravy vozidel
2
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

62%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Mso servis spol. s r.o.
5 26,593,213
Waler, spol. s r.o.
1 13,986,651
Moravská stavební unie - Msu s.r.o.
1 8,226,278
Firefighting Technology Int. s.r.o.
2 6,451,000
Wiss Czech, s.r.o.
1 4,427,070
Other suppliers 5 10,537,528

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 20% (1 from 5)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

39%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 70,221,741
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 383,313,514
Total 453,535,254

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

56%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Technické zhodnocení CAS 24 Tatra
Not disclosed
- 2,435,000
Technologie na mytí a sušení hadic
Not disclosed
- 2,066,723
Mikulov PS - výstavba nové požární stanice - dodatečné stavební práce
Not disclosed
- 1,487,593
Rychlý zásahový automobil
Not disclosed
- 1,363,085
Oprava havarijního stavu AZ 30
Not disclosed
- 1,081,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

71%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 17%
Average requirements modifications count 0.67

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

43%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Final or estimated price not published 27% (4 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing supplier ID 7% (1 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 15)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 15)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

45%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.41 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

79%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 15)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 7% (1 from 15)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier donating to political party 7% (1 from 15)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 27% (4 from 15)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 56%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.