Government • 2015

Hasičský záchranný sbor Středočeského kraje

IČO 70885371

Good buyer. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

10.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

81%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Stanice HZS Čáslav - výstavba nové stanice
Výstavba požárních stanic
9
Ø5 in industry
Cisternová automobilová stříkačka
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
2
Ø2 in industry
Cisternová automobilová stříkačka
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
2
Ø2 in industry
"Stavební připravenost lokality OPIS"
Úpravy budov
5
Ø4 in industry
Protichemické ochranné oděvy typu 1a spolufinancované z integrovaného operačního programu
Ochranné oděvy proti chemickým a biologickým prostředkům
4
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

62%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Bursík Holding, a.s.
1 25,949,485
Tht Polička, s.r.o.
3 13,893,820
Zlínské stavby, a.s.
1 5,135,522
Is Star s.r.o.
1 4,762,686
Marine s.r.o.
1 3,680,000
Other suppliers 7 14,012,785

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

39%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 67,434,299
Unregulated purchases 378,854,576
Total 446,288,876

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 61%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

83%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 14)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 14)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 14)
Missing supplier ID 14% (2 from 14)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 14)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 14)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 14)
Missing call for tenders 7% (1 from 14)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

23%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 27% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.62 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

76%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 14)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 36% (5 from 14)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

38%
average 56%

Conditional disclosure

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.