KRAJ • 2016

Moravskoslezský kraj

IČO 70890692

Good buyer. Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts. Court found serious misconduct.

3.
ranking
80%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

73%
average 69%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zajištění dopravní obslužnosti Moravskoslezského kraje – oblast Jablunkovsko - Třinecko
Služby veřejné silniční dopravy
3
Ø3 in industry
„Zhotovení stavby »Pavilon chirurgických oborů v Nemocnici ve Frýdku-Místku, p.o.«“
Výstavba nemocničních zařízení
13
Ø3 in industry
"INTEGROVANÉ VÝJEZDOVÉ CENTRUM TŘINEC“ - výběr zhotovitele stavby
Výstavba požárních stanic
9
Ø5 in industry
„Integrované výjezdové centrum Ostrava - Jih“
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
„Vybudování pavilonu interních oborů ve Slezské nemocnici v Opavě“
Výstavba nemocničních zařízení
17
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

93%
average 90%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Čsad Vsetín a.s.
1 759,553,441
Strabag a.s.
10 505,857,005
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
10 410,038,804
Zlínstav a.s.
7 407,050,397
Metrostav a.s.
5 343,153,431
Other suppliers 448 4,329,087,715

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 76%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 58% (97 from 166)
Nonprice competition 36% (60 from 166)
Lots 46% (77 from 166)
E-auction 0% (0 from 166)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

91%
average 76%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 6,951,803,508
Unregulated purchases 1,470,388,643
Total 8,422,192,152

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

78%
average 69%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

52%
average 62%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 1%
Cancelled contracts 30%
Average requirements modifications count 1.38

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

88%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 1% (5 from 482)
Final or estimated price not published 1% (7 from 482)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 482)
Missing supplier ID 3% (15 from 482)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 482)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 482)
Call and award notices contradict each other 1% (6 from 482)
Missing call for tenders 12% (58 from 482)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

89%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (2 from 482)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 1% (4 from 482)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 5% (25 from 482)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 482)
Supplier bankruptcy 1% (4 from 482)
Supplier donating to political party 6% (28 from 482)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 15% (70 from 482)