Government • 2015

Hasičský záchranný sbor Plzeňského kraje

IČO 70883378

Good buyer. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. There are not many contract extensions and ammendments.

1.
ranking
78%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

74%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Dopravní automobil spolufinancovaný z Integrovaného operačního programu
Hasičská vozidla
7
Ø2 in industry
Cisternová automobilová stříkačka
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
2
Ø2 in industry
Cisternová automobilová stříkačka
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
3
Ø2 in industry
Cisternová automobilová stříkačka (2ks)
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
2
Ø2 in industry
Osobní automobily
Osobní vozidla
4
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

60%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Tht Polička, s.r.o.
3 10,542,000
Wiss Czech, s.r.o.
2 10,193,000
Profi Auto Cz a.s.
1 9,319,859
Porsche Inter Auto Cz spol. s r.o.
2 4,413,794
Kobit, spol. s r.o.
1 2,140,000
Other suppliers 5 1,826,058

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 29% (2 from 7)
Nonprice competition 43% (3 from 7)
Lots 29% (2 from 7)
E-auction 0% (0 from 7)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

38%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 38,434,712
Unregulated purchases 223,975,680
Total 262,410,392

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 61%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

96%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.17

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 14)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 14)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 14)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 14)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 14)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 14)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 14)
Missing call for tenders 14% (2 from 14)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

78%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 86% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.38 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

79%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 7% (1 from 14)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 14)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 14% (2 from 14)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 7% (1 from 14)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

50%
average 56%

Conditional disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.