Hospitals • 2015

Thomayerova nemocnice

IČO 00064190

Good buyer. Court found serious misconduct. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

5.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

49%
average 57%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

85%
average 69%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Roche s.r.o.
4 153,389,666
Pharmos, a.s.
9 131,989,219
P.dussmann spol. s r.o.
1 75,864,834
Phoenix lékárenský velkoobchod, a.s.
8 65,887,670
Teva Pharmaceuticals Cr, s.r.o.
3 58,394,280
Other suppliers 71 404,386,790

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

81%
average 82%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 20% (11 from 54)
Nonprice competition 11% (6 from 54)
Lots 74% (40 from 54)
E-auction 0% (0 from 54)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

62%
average 45%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 912,491,404
Unregulated purchases 1,460,329,080
Total 2,372,820,485

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
TN Praha - dodávky léku – COPAXONE 20MG/ML INJ SOL 28X20MG/ML – L03AX13
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
20,326,713
Zajišťování distribuce elektřiny do FTNsP
Not disclosed
13,564,000
Pozáruční péče a svěřená správa AMIS*PACS komplex
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
6,240,000
Provozování vnitřních rozvodů tepla a dalších navazujících technologických zařízení v objektech FTNsP
Not disclosed
6,000,000
Thomayerova nemocnice - RTG lampa pro CT přístroj
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
2,800,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

72%
average 53%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 22%
Average requirements modifications count 0.22

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

93%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 96)
Final or estimated price not published 32% (31 from 96)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 96)
Missing supplier ID 1% (1 from 96)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 96)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 96)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 96)
Missing call for tenders 3% (3 from 96)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

55%
average 45%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 67% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.74 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

98%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 2% (2 from 96)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 96)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 96)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 96)
Supplier bankruptcy 1% (1 from 96)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 96)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 10% (10 from 96)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

50%
average 33%

Partial disclosure

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.