Government • 2015

Správa státních hmotných rezerv

IČO 48133990

Good buyer. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. There are not many contract extensions and ammendments.

10.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

75%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Petrolej letecký JET A1 – nákup 40 000 m3 do nouzových zásob
Letecký petrolej
4
Ø3 in industry
Nákup leteckého petroleje do nouzových zásob
Letecký petrolej
5
Ø3 in industry
Nákup leteckého petroleje do nouzových zásob
Letecký petrolej
5
Ø3 in industry
Nákup 15 000 m3 leteckého petroleje JET A-1
Letecký petrolej
3
Ø3 in industry
Nákup 9 000 m3 nafty motorové pro arktické nebo extrémně zimní klima třídy 2 dle ČSN EN 590
Nafta (EN 590)
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

60%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Unipetrol Rpa, s.r.o.
2 815,145,999
Prakov, spol. s r.o.
3 413,750,000
Kovmat, Trade s.r.o.
1 363,287,400
Hramax, s.r.o.
1 336,443,800
Makov s.r.o.
1 89,715,000
Other suppliers 37 195,386,842

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

62%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 2,216,629,041
Unregulated purchases 3,590,159,638
Total 5,806,788,679

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

91%
average 61%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

55%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 6%
Cancelled contracts 38%
Average requirements modifications count 0.12

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

51%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 11% (5 from 45)
Final or estimated price not published 4% (2 from 45)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 45)
Missing supplier ID 4% (2 from 45)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 45)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 45)
Call and award notices contradict each other 2% (1 from 45)
Missing call for tenders 4% (2 from 45)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

81%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 92% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.47 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

85%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 45)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 4% (2 from 45)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 2% (1 from 45)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 45)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 45)
Supplier donating to political party 2% (1 from 45)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 18% (8 from 45)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

50%
average 56%

Conditional disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.