Large cities • 2016

Město Litvínov

IČO 00266027

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts.

14.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

72%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zajištění komplexního nakládání s komunálními odpady - sběr, svoz a odstranění komunálního odpadu, svoz bioodpadu, využití vytříděných složek komunálního odpadu a správa sběrného dvora ve městě Litvínov
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
2
Ø3 in industry
Revitalizace zámku Valdštejnů v Litvínově
Stavební úpravy uměleckých a kulturních budov
7
Ø3 in industry
Kulturní dům Citadela - realizace úspor energie (zateplení)
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace
13
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce horní haly Zimního stadionu Ivana Hlinky v Litvínově - etapa 1.a
Stavební práce
10
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce ZŠS Šafaříkova 991, Litvínov
Stavební úpravy školních budov
12
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

81%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Ela Litvínov, spol. s r.o.
17 67,966,973
Marius Pedersen a.s.
1 65,784,737
Kp servis Most s.r.o.
9 45,588,018
Herkul a.s.
15 26,082,571
Allkon s.r.o.
7 24,047,874
Other suppliers 50 144,408,772

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

75%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (4 from 0)
Nonprice competition 7% (2 from 27)
Division into lots 26% (7 from 27)
E-auction 0% (0 from 27)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 27)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

81%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 453,990,393
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 240,961,541
Total 694,951,934

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

47%
average 77%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce ulice Ruská, Litvínov
Not disclosed
- 13,300,000
Dodávka tepelné energie pro ZSIH
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
- 10,500,000
Revitalizace MŠ Paraplíčko v Litvínově 2015 - část 1 Revitalizace MŠ Paraplíčko v Litvínově - stavební práce - dodatečné práce č.3
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
- 8,986,177
Revitalizace MŠ Paraplíčko v Litvínově 2015 - část 1 Revitalizace MŠ Paraplíčko v Litvínově - stavební práce - dodatečné práce č.1
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
- 8,986,177
Revitalizace MŠ Paraplíčko v Litvínově 2015 - část 1 Revitalizace MŠ Paraplíčko v Litvínově - stavební práce - dodatečné práce č.2
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
- 8,986,177

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 6%
Cancelled contracts 9%
Average requirements modifications count 0.48

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

78%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 30% (30 from 99)
Final or estimated price not published 52% (51 from 99)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 99)
Missing supplier ID 3% (3 from 99)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 99)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 99)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 99)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 99)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 99)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

53%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 60% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.47 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

85%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 99)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 99)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 4% (4 from 99)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 99)
Supplier bankruptcy 1% (1 from 99)
Supplier donating to political party 2% (2 from 99)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (12 from 99)