Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Čelákovice

IČO 00240117

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

51%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Výstavba MŠ Sluníčko v ulici J. A. Komenského v Čelákovicích
Stavební práce
11
Ø5 in industry
Protipovodňový varovný, informační a monitorovací systém města Čelákovice
Elektrické strojní zařízení, přístroje, zařízení a spotřební materiál, osvětlení
2
Ø2 in industry
ČOV Čelákovice - strojně technologické úpravy biologického stupně
Čistírny odpadních vod
1
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy MŠ – Čelákovice
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Propojení ulice Stankovského se silnicí II/245 rekonstrukcí ulice v Prokopě
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
13
Ø7 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

76%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
CALIPSUM s.r.o.
1 18,361,574
TELMO a.s.
1 8,115,829
KUNST, spol. s r.o.
1 7,998,890
M-SILNICE a.s.
3 7,435,922
DKK Stav s.r.o.
1 7,280,758
Other suppliers 9 24,717,164

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 67% (2 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Inovativni 0% ( from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

50%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 121,311,502
Zakazky maleho rozsahu 0
Unregulated purchases 366,443,285
Total 487,754,787

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

92%
average 91%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

92%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.67

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

89%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 17)
Final or estimated price not published 12% (2 from 17)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 17)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 17)
Missing buyer ID 6% (1 from 17)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 17)
Missing call for tenders 6% (1 from 17)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 17)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 17)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 6% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.24 (average mistakes per contract)
Uveřejňují se na profilu zakázky malého rozsahu? (Poměřujeme proti počtu 17 zakázek v režimu zákona)
0-250K 0 zakázek
250K-500K 0 zakázek
500K-1000K 0 zakázek
1000K+ 0 zakázek