Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Černošice

IČO 00241121

Good buyer. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts. Buyer supports competition by providing extended deadlines for tender submissions.


Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 49%
Largest contracts
Mateřská škola v Husově ulici, Černošice
Construction work
Ø5 in industry
Sportovní hala u ZŠ Černošice, Mokropsy
Multi-purpose sports facilities construction work
Ø4 in industry
Nová radnice - rekonstrukce a přístavba budovy č.p. 259
Construction work
Ø5 in industry
Půdní vestavba učeben ZŠ Černošice – Mokropsy
Construction work
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy a přístavba ZŠ v Černošicích
Construction work
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Chládek & Tintěra, a.s.
3 67,703,889
CL-EVANS s.r.o.
1 43,399,627
Chládek a Tintěra, a.s.
1 39,758,404
METALL QUATRO spol. s r.o.
1 36,826,246
RUMPOLD-P s.r.o.
1 25,760,000
Other suppliers 12 81,114,240

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 59%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 406,739,128
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 247,271,411
Total 654,010,539

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 77%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 21)
Final or estimated price not published 24% (5 from 21)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 21)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 21)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 21)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 21)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 21)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 21)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 21)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 70% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.20 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 20 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders