Small cities • 2016

Město Bílovec

IČO 00297755

The supplier portfolio is relatively broad. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's

144.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

72%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Modernizace a přístavba domova pro seniory v Bílovci pro zvýšení kvality poskytovaných služeb – stavební práce
Stavební práce
10
Ø5 in industry
Městská knihovna a centrum pro seniory v Bílovci
Stavební práce
14
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy DPS v Bílovci, Část 2 - Tepelné čerpadlo DPS Bílovec
Tepelná čerpadla
3
Ø3 in industry
Obnova nádvoří zámku v Bílovci
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
4
Ø6 in industry
Cyklostezka Bílovec,místní část Stará Ves-1.část II.etapy
Výstavba cyklistických stezek
17
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

82%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
G&g Building s.r.o.
2 22,213,145
Pss Přerovská stavební a.s.
7 15,974,683
Nosta, s.r.o.
8 8,697,054
Centropol Energy, a.s.
4 8,345,741
Fichna - Hudeczek a.s.
3 6,626,480
Other suppliers 23 49,616,367

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

89%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 27%
Average requirements modifications count 1.20

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

81%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 47)
Final or estimated price not published 45% (21 from 47)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 47)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 47)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 47)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 47)
Call and award notices contradict each other 2% (1 from 47)
Missing call for tenders 9% (4 from 47)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

77%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 47)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 47)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 6% (3 from 47)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 47)
Supplier bankruptcy 2% (1 from 47)
Supplier donating to political party 11% (5 from 47)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 23% (11 from 47)