Large cities • 2016

Město Sokolov

IČO 00259586

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer does not avoid following procurement law.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

59%
average 63%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

81%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metrostav a.s.
3 123,917,870
Bezpečná ulice a.s.
1 74,232,000
Amper Market, a.s.
2 70,945,842
Centropol Energy, a.s.
1 55,775,638
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
4 41,503,115
Other suppliers 51 214,093,133

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

73%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 12% (3 from 24)
Nonprice competition 4% (1 from 24)
Lots 25% (6 from 24)
E-auction 0% (0 from 24)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

74%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 580,467,604
Unregulated purchases 485,514,028
Total 1,065,981,632

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

24%
average 77%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

61%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 9%
Cancelled contracts 21%
Average requirements modifications count 0.65

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

78%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 3% (2 from 62)
Final or estimated price not published 18% (11 from 62)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 62)
Missing supplier ID 3% (2 from 62)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 62)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 62)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 62)
Missing call for tenders 6% (4 from 62)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

49%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 51% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.15 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

93%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 62)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 62)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 2% (1 from 62)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 62)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 62)
Supplier donating to political party 2% (1 from 62)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 13% (8 from 62)