Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Litomyšl

IČO 00276944

Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

78.
ranking
69%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

53%
average 49%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

68%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
2 24,617,958
PRVNÍ STAVEBNÍ CHRUDIM a.s.
1 12,876,970
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
5 7,833,961
ENERGREEN PROJEKT s.r.o.
1 6,246,000
HOCHTIEF CZ a.s.
1 5,903,585
Other suppliers 10 16,578,766

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

42%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 196,276,145
Unregulated purchases 903,519,042
Total 1,099,795,187

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

99%
average 91%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

83%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

89%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 18% (3 from 17)
Final or estimated price not published 6% (1 from 17)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 17)
Missing supplier ID 6% (1 from 17)
Missing buyer ID 18% (3 from 17)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 17)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 17)
Missing call for tenders 6% (1 from 17)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

40%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 71% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.24 (average mistakes per contract)