Small cities • 2016

Město Humpolec

IČO 00248266

Good buyer. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad. Buyer publishes without flaws in procurement journal.

53.
ranking
76%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

77%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Humpolec, stavební úpravy ulic Žižkova, Smetanova
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
7
Ø5 in industry
Tenisový areál Humpolec
Výstavba sportovních hal
5
Ø4 in industry
Humpolec, Regenerace veřejného prostranství sídliště Stromovka II. etapa včetně odvádění dešťových vod
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
12
Ø5 in industry
Humpolec, stavební úpravy ulice Rašínova
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
11
Ø5 in industry
Vybudování nových prostor Mateřské školy Humpolec, Na Rybníčku 1316
Výstavba vzdělávacích zařízení
3
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

73%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Syner Vhs Vysočina, a.s.
2 20,741,000
Chládek a Tintěra Havlíčkův Brod, a.s.
1 14,703,218
Mps Mostní a pozemní stavby s.r.o.
1 13,916,139
Konstrukce a dopravní stavby s.r.o.
1 11,599,318
Bačina stavební firma a.s.
1 10,098,717
Other suppliers 4 18,804,953

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 20% (1 from 5)
Nonprice competition 20% (1 from 5)
Lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 40% (2 from 5)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

64%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 29%
Average requirements modifications count 0.29

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 10)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

97%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 10)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 10% (1 from 10)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 10)