Large cities • 2016

Město Orlová

IČO 00297577

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

29.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

62%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zateplení a výměna výplní otvorů ZŠ K. Dvořáčka 1230 v Orlové-Lutyni
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
Dodávka elektrické energie pro objekty a zařízení spravované Městem Orlová a příspěvkovými organizacemi pro rok 2014 a 2015
Elektrická energie
5
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy komunikace ulice Klášterní a v Zimném dole
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
7
Ø6 in industry
Odkanalizování okrajových částí města Orlová - dodatečné stavební práce
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
1
Ø5 in industry
Orlová - sesuv Olmovec II
Stavební práce vztahující se k odtoku odpadních vod
4
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

83%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Beskydská stavební, a.s.
3 19,657,795
Amper Market, a.s.
2 17,554,200
S u b t e r r a a.s.
4 15,682,873
Strabag a.s.
4 13,099,348
Firesta-fišer, rekonstrukce, stavby a.s.
2 7,254,984
Other suppliers 27 52,385,419

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

69%
average 70%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

37%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 125,634,627
Unregulated purchases 779,702,016
Total 905,336,643

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

54%
average 77%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

77%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 17%
Average requirements modifications count 0.29

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

94%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 42)
Final or estimated price not published 14% (6 from 42)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 42)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 42)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 42)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 42)
Call and award notices contradict each other 2% (1 from 42)
Missing call for tenders 2% (1 from 42)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

66%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 90% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.07 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

81%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 42)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 42)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 2% (1 from 42)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 42)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 42)
Supplier donating to political party 12% (5 from 42)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 14% (6 from 42)