Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Orlová

IČO 00297577

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Enough firms are competing for contracts.

6.
ranking
80%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

87%
average 52%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

57%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
KR OSTRAVA a.s.
2 91,036,783
STAMONT - POZEMNÍ STAVITELSTVÍ s.r.o.
1 77,586,783
Amper Market, a.s.
1 14,000,000
MH - STAVBY, s.r.o.
1 10,975,257
BYSTROŇ Group a.s.
1 9,199,880
Other suppliers 17 43,812,647

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

63%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 60% (12 from 20)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 20)
Division into lots 5% (1 from 20)
E-auction 10% (2 from 20)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 20)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

49%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 351,515,724
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 1,089,646,828
Total 1,441,162,552

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Stavební úpravy komunikace na ul. Přespolní - dodatečné stavební práce
Additional works
- 901,054
Zajištění bezbariérového přístupu k ZŠ Slezská II - dodatečné stavební práce
Additional works
- 246,832
Rekonstrukce budovy MěÚ čp. 796 v Orlové-Lutyni - dodatečné stavební práce
Additional works
- 102,813
Orlová - sesuv Olmovec II - dodatečné stavební práce
Additional works
- 14,539

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

86%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 5%
Cancelled contracts 5%
Average requirements modifications count 0.55

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

86%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 25)
Final or estimated price not published 8% (2 from 25)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 25)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 25)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 25)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 25)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 25)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 25)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 25)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

95%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.19 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 21 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders