Small cities • 2016

Město Čáslav

IČO 00236021

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

108.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

66%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Stavba nekryté ledové plochy
Výstavba víceúčelových sportovních zařízení
4
Ø4 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy Městské nemocnice Čáslav
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy společenského sálu Grand
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Komunikace Jeníkovská
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
Nákup komodity zemní plyn v rámci sdružených služeb dodávky elektřiny na rok 2015
Zemní plyn
5
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

66%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Realitní a stavební společnost s.r.o.
5 45,452,096
Syner, s.r.o.
5 40,408,248
Pragoplyn, a.s.
4 28,532,967
E.on Energie, a.s.
2 9,921,612
Ave Kolín s.r.o.
1 9,268,346
Other suppliers 9 26,334,344

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 5)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 5)
Lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

91%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

53%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 13%
Cancelled contracts 25%
Average requirements modifications count 0.38

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

81%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 22% (6 from 27)
Final or estimated price not published 30% (8 from 27)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 27)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 27)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 27)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 27)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 27)
Missing call for tenders 7% (2 from 27)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

85%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 27)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 27)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 4% (1 from 27)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 27)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 27)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 27)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 11% (3 from 27)