Large cities • 2016

Město Trutnov

IČO 00278360

Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

34%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce ulice Horská, Trutnov – Horní Staré Město
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení ZŠ Mládežnická - pavilon A, B1
Tepelné izolace
5
Ø6 in industry
CYKLISTICKÁ STEZKA STARÝ ROKYTNÍK – BOJIŠTĚ II.
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Centrální nákup elektrické energie v letech 2015 a 2016
Elektrická energie
5
Ø4 in industry
Regenerace zeleně a veřejných ploch Jiráskova náměstí v Trutnově
Služby vysazování a údržby zelených ploch
2
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

74%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
M - Silnice a.s.
2 24,399,383
Stylbau, s.r.o.
2 17,292,069
Bak stavební společnost, a.s.
9 12,529,922
Centropol Energy, a.s.
2 12,487,550
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
3 10,955,485
Other suppliers 12 25,166,120

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 40% (2 from 5)
Nonprice competition 20% (1 from 5)
Lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

39%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 104,245,803
Unregulated purchases 571,536,318
Total 675,782,122

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

74%
average 77%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

85%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.60

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

87%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 30)
Final or estimated price not published 17% (5 from 30)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 30)
Missing supplier ID 3% (1 from 30)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 30)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 30)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 30)
Missing call for tenders 7% (2 from 30)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

66%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 70% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.20 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

91%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 30)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 30)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 30)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 30)
Supplier bankruptcy 3% (1 from 30)
Supplier donating to political party 30% (9 from 30)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 7% (2 from 30)