Small cities • 2016

Město Nový Bydžov

IČO 00269247

Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

61%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Vybudování Sběrného dvora v Novém Bydžově
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Konsolidace a další rozvoj TC ORP NOvý Bydžov
Balíky programů a informační systémy
2
Ø2 in industry
Energeticky úsporná opatření Sokolovna Nový Bydžov
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace
9
Ø4 in industry
Energeticky úsporná opatření MK Balounka Nový Bydžov
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace
8
Ø4 in industry
Protipovodňová opatření pro město Nový Bydžov
Rozhlas, televize, komunikace, telekomunikace a související zařízení
3
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

85%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Esco, stavební společnost, s.r.o.
2 7,163,815
Skanska a.s.
4 7,032,850
Stratos Auto, spol. s r.o.
2 6,808,000
Ag Com, a.s.
1 5,598,000
Energokomplex, spol. s r.o.
1 5,239,528
Other suppliers 14 29,846,944

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 100% (1 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 50%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

33%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 24)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 24)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 24)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 24)
Missing buyer ID 4% (1 from 24)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 24)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 24)
Missing call for tenders 50% (12 from 24)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

95%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 24)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 24)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 4% (1 from 24)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 24)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 24)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 24)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 4% (1 from 24)