Small cities • 2016

Město Jičín

IČO 00271632

The supplier portfolio is relatively broad. Suppliers showing "red flags" are seen quite often.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

62%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Novostavba mateřské školy Větrov
Stavební úpravy budov mateřských škol
3
Ø5 in industry
Technická vybavenost Lidické náměstí - východ v Jičíně
Výstavba vedlejších komunikací
6
Ø6 in industry
Areál ZŠ Soudná - stavební úpravy objektu čp. 15 na denní stacionář
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro zdravotní a sociální péči, krematorií a veřejných záchodků
6
Ø4 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti ZŠ Železnická 460, Jičín
Tepelné izolace
7
Ø6 in industry
Realizace úspor energie MŠ Máj, Jičín (opakované řízení)
Tepelné izolace
12
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

76%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Fato a.s., člen holdingu Fato
10 37,736,992
Matex Hk s.r.o.
9 30,387,817
M - Silnice a.s.
2 17,255,497
Staving, spol. s r.o.
4 17,159,601
Stav-agency s.r.o.
2 10,242,419
Other suppliers 29 46,751,235

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

69%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

77%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 9%
Average requirements modifications count 0.82

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 42% (25 from 59)
Final or estimated price not published 29% (17 from 59)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 59)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 59)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 59)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 59)
Call and award notices contradict each other 3% (2 from 59)
Missing call for tenders 2% (1 from 59)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

62%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 59)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 59)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 59)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 59)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 59)
Supplier donating to political party 36% (21 from 59)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 22% (13 from 59)