Large cities • 2016

Statutární město Havířov

IČO 00297488

Competitions are open to multiple bidders. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

14.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

58%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
VÝMĚNA OKEN V OBYTNÝCH DOMECH VE VLASTNICTVÍ MĚSTA HAVÍŘOVA
Instalace a montáž dveří a oken a souvisejících výrobků
12
Ø6 in industry
REGENERACE OBYTNÝCH DOMŮ NA UL. MLÁDÍ A M. PUJMANOVÉ
Rekonstrukce budov
4
Ø5 in industry
Odkanalizování části města Havířova - III. etapa
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
4
Ø5 in industry
Náměstí T. G. Masaryka - zhotovitel
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
„Snižování spotřeby energie ZŠ Žákovská, Havířov“
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

83%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Hochtief Cz a. s.
5 160,614,687
Ri Okna a.s.
1 94,018,013
Ohl Žs, a.s.
3 70,107,215
Staseko Plus s.r.o.
1 44,188,597
Bdstav Morava s.r.o.
1 37,917,048
Other suppliers 63 335,711,459

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

65%
average 70%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

52%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 745,616,494
Unregulated purchases 1,995,135,410
Total 2,740,751,904

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 77%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

57%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 3%
Cancelled contracts 29%
Average requirements modifications count 0.55

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

83%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 79)
Final or estimated price not published 37% (29 from 79)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 79)
Missing supplier ID 1% (1 from 79)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 79)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 79)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 79)
Missing call for tenders 6% (5 from 79)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

63%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 79% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.82 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

89%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 79)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 79)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 79)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 79)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 79)
Supplier donating to political party 1% (1 from 79)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 20% (16 from 79)