Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Havlíčkův Brod

IČO 00267449

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

38%
average 52%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

73%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
E.ON Energie, a.s.
3 70,584,942
Chládek a Tintěra Havlíčkův Brod, a.s.
4 58,439,676
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
2 41,438,170
ROBRO s.r.o.
1 33,844,444
RITUS s.r.o.
2 19,479,867
Other suppliers 14 66,376,914

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

82%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 28% (5 from 18)
Nonprice competition 6% (1 from 18)
Lots 11% (2 from 18)
E-auction 28% (5 from 18)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

74%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 514,780,823
Unregulated purchases 412,810,599
Total 927,591,421

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

88%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Výměna umělého fotbalového trávníku UT3G hřiště Na Losích
Outside directive scope
9,117,379

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 11%
Cancelled contracts 17%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

90%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 33)
Final or estimated price not published 6% (2 from 33)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 33)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 33)
Missing buyer ID 3% (1 from 33)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 33)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 33)
Missing call for tenders 9% (3 from 33)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

22%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 67% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.78 (average mistakes per contract)