Small cities • 2016

Město Brandýs nad Labem - Stará Boleslav

IČO 00240079

Enough firms are competing for contracts. Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

81%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zajištění odpadového hospodářství a komunálních služeb na území města Brandýs nad Labem - Stará Boleslav
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
5
Ø3 in industry
Rekonstrukce ulic Kralupská, Nádražní a Riegrova v Brandýse nad Labem
Stavební práce
14
Ø5 in industry
Novostavba MŠ v Brandýse nad Labem
Výstavba vzdělávacích zařízení
5
Ø4 in industry
Rozšíření radnice na pozemku stpč. 204/1 v k.ú. Brandýs nad Labem
Výstavba domů
2
Ø5 in industry
Zajištění bezpečnosti a prevence dalšího sesuvu bastionu a svahů v areálu zámku Brandýs nad Labem
Konstrukční a stavební práce
1
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

41%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Ave Cz odpadové hospodářství s.r.o.
2 234,588,576
Porr a.s.
1 33,750,790
Společnost T.a.q. s.r.o.
5 33,220,032
Ekologické a inženýrské stavby, spol. s r.o., zkratka Ekis, spol. s r.o.
2 16,232,182
Stavokomplet spol.s r.o.
2 15,233,460
Other suppliers 25 69,011,024

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

88%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

48%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 5%
Cancelled contracts 21%
Average requirements modifications count 1.69

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

95%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 8% (3 from 37)
Final or estimated price not published 19% (7 from 37)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 37)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 37)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 37)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 37)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 37)
Missing call for tenders 11% (4 from 37)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

68%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 37)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 37)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 37)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 37)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 37)
Supplier donating to political party 16% (6 from 37)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 19% (7 from 37)