Small cities • 2016

Město Třeboň

IČO 00247618

Enough firms are competing for contracts. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

108.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

86%
average 59%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

74%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
E.on Energie, a.s.
2 54,912,541
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
1 45,491,640
Porr a.s.
2 44,360,819
Swietelsky stavební s.r.o.
1 25,543,976
Pragoplyn, a.s.
1 18,461,738
Other suppliers 11 62,880,832

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

84%
average 64%

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

74%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Nákup zemního plynu na Komoditní Burze PROFIT pro Město Třeboň, příspěvkové organizace, jejichž zřizovatelem je Třeboň a obchodní společnosti, které Město Třeboň ovládá.
Not disclosed
- 18,461,738

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

53%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 13%
Average requirements modifications count 1.44

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

86%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 17% (3 from 18)
Final or estimated price not published 6% (1 from 18)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 18)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 18)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 18)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 18)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 18)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 18)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 18)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

95%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 18)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier donating to political party 6% (1 from 18)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 6% (1 from 18)