Small cities • 2016

Město Lysá nad Labem

IČO 00239402

Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..). The competition for contracts is high.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

86%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
"MVR-1090047-Výstavba a rekonstrukce stokových systémů ve městě Lysá nad Labem"- dodatek č.4 (vícepráce)
Stavební práce
19
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace historického centra města Lysá nad Labem
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
10
Ø6 in industry
Rekonstrukce školního hřiště v Lysé nad Labem - I. etapa
Výstavba víceúčelových sportovních zařízení
11
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce muzea Bedřicha Hrozného v Lysé nad Labem
Stavební úpravy domů
4
Ø4 in industry
Konsolidace IT a nové služby ORP Lysá nad Labem
Počítače
1
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

56%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Stavokomplet spol.s r.o.
1 24,716,309
Dlažba Vysoké Mýto, s.r.o.
1 16,549,603
Vyslystav s.r.o.
1 8,544,268
L O U Č K A Pardubice s.r.o.
1 7,851,115
Gordic spol. s r.o.
1 2,839,260
Other suppliers 2 3,381,992

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Division into lots 100% (1 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

91%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Sdružené služby dodávek elektrické energie pro Město Lysá nad Labem
Not disclosed
- 1,403,523

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 67%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

35%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 14% (1 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 14% (1 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 29% (2 from 7)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 7)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 7)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

70%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 7)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier bankruptcy 14% (1 from 7)
Supplier donating to political party 14% (1 from 7)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 14% (1 from 7)