Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Lysá nad Labem

IČO 00239402

Small number of firms recieve most of contracts. Buyer supports competition by providing extended deadlines for tender submissions.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

25%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Provozování vodovodů a kanalizací pro veřejnou potřebu města Lysá nad Labem

2
Ø3 in industry
Kanalizace a vodovod Byšičky
Sewage services
10
Ø6 in industry
Parkovací zařízení na jízdní kola Lysá nad Labem
Prefabricated constructions
1
Ø6 in industry
Rekonstrukce muzea Bedřicha Hrozného v Lysé nad Labem

4
Ø4 in industry
Dodávka a montáž nových svítidel Lysá nad Labem
Lighting equipment and electric lamps
6
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

15%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STAVOKOMPLET spol. s r.o.
1 147,089,326
KVIS Pardubice a.s.
1 15,954,950
SYSTEMATICA s.r.o.
1 9,845,988
LOUČKA Pardubice s.r.o.
1 7,851,115
SunnyMont s.r.o.
1 3,474,084
Other suppliers 3 5,065,663

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

87%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 100% (2 from 2)
Nonprice competition 67% (2 from 3)
Division into lots 33% (1 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

66%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 240,494,830
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 312,199,032
Total 552,693,862

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

78%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 29% (2 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 7)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 7)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 7)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

57%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 71% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.57 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 7 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders