Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Lysá nad Labem

IČO 00239402

Small number of firms recieve most of contracts. Buyer supports competition by providing extended deadlines for tender submissions.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 49%
Largest contracts
Provozování vodovodů a kanalizací pro veřejnou potřebu města Lysá nad Labem
Veřejné služby
Ø3 in industry
Kanalizace a vodovod Byšičky
Ø6 in industry
Parkovací zařízení na jízdní kola Lysá nad Labem
Výstavba stavebních konstrukcí
Ø6 in industry
Rekonstrukce muzea Bedřicha Hrozného v Lysé nad Labem
Stavební úpravy domů
Ø4 in industry
Dodávka a montáž nových svítidel Lysá nad Labem
Elektrické zdroje světla a svítidla
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STAVOKOMPLET spol. s r.o.
1 147,089,326
KVIS Pardubice a.s.
1 15,954,950
1 9,845,988
LOUČKA Pardubice s.r.o.
1 7,851,115
SunnyMont s.r.o.
1 3,474,084
Other suppliers 3 5,065,663

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 67% (2 from 3)
Nonprice competition 67% (2 from 3)
Lots 33% (1 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 240,494,830
Unregulated purchases 312,199,032
Total 552,693,862

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 29% (2 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 7)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 71% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.57 (average mistakes per contract)