Small cities • 2016

Město Otrokovice

IČO 00284301

Buyer supports competition by providing extended deadlines for tender submissions. Small number of firms recieve most of contracts.

129.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

51%
average 59%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

41%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
1 84,348,224
Pozimos, a.s.
2 21,866,037
Strabag a.s.
1 12,499,502
Moderní škola s.r.o.
1 6,726,039
Right Power Energy, s.r.o.
1 5,875,754
Other suppliers 8 17,590,316

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 64%

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

84%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Nákup elektřiny NN na Komoditní burze PROFIT pro město Otrokovice a jeho příspěvkové organizace
Not disclosed
- 5,875,754
Nákup elektřiny VN na Komoditní burze PROFIT pro město Otrokovice a jeho příspěvkové organizace
Not disclosed
- 712,573

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

78%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 13%
Average requirements modifications count 0.38

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

84%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 14% (2 from 14)
Final or estimated price not published 21% (3 from 14)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 14)
Missing supplier ID 14% (2 from 14)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 14)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 14)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 14)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 14)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 14)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

92%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 14)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier donating to political party 21% (3 from 14)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 14)