Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Otrokovice

IČO 00284301

Small number of firms recieve most of contracts. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

23%
average 49%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

22%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Zlínstav a.s.
1 64,984,962
OMLUX, spol. s r.o.
1 7,985,232
Amper Market, a.s.
1 6,105,105
E.ON Energie, a.s.
1 5,235,762
SPS - VKP s.r.o.
1 5,000,000
Other suppliers 2 1,518,633

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

87%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 67% (2 from 3)
E-auction 67% (2 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

55%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 234,400,967
Unregulated purchases 544,192,995
Total 778,593,962

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 2.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 5)
Final or estimated price not published 40% (2 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 5)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 5)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 5)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

45%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 80% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.40 (average mistakes per contract)