Small cities • 2016

Město Přelouč

IČO 00274101

Good buyer. Enough firms are competing for contracts. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

37.
ranking
78%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

90%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce fotbalového stadionu
Stavební úpravy sportovních zařízení
8
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce tribuny fotbalového stadionu - Přelouč
Stavební úpravy sportovních zařízení
14
Ø4 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu MŠ Kladenská, Přelouč
Stavební úpravy budov mateřských škol
13
Ø5 in industry
Protipovodňová opatření města Přelouč
Systémy pro veřejný rozhlas
3
Ø2 in industry
Konsolidace IT a nové služby TC ORP Přelouč
Informační systémy a servery
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

80%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Vodní zdroje Ekomonitor spol. s r.o.
1 13,969,889
Langerone, Se
2 9,260,490
Mikostav s.r.o.
1 5,570,300
Ivexi s.r.o.
1 5,564,579
Tomáš Mikula
1 5,058,164
Other suppliers 9 27,800,269

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 25% (1 from 4)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 4)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

74%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Nákup elektřiny NN pro město Přelouč a jeho příspěvkové organizace pro rok 2014 a 2015
Not disclosed
- 2,819,803
Nákup zemního plynu pro město Přelouč a jeho příspěvkové organizace pro rok 2014
Not disclosed
- 1,990,258

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

94%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.25

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 13% (2 from 15)
Final or estimated price not published 13% (2 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 7% (1 from 15)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 15)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 15)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

93%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 15)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 13% (2 from 15)