Small cities • 2016

Vodohospodářské sdružení Turnov

IČO 49295934

Good buyer. Enough firms are competing for contracts. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

24.
ranking
80%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

100%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Odkanalizování Rovenska pod Troskami
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
21
Ø5 in industry
Intenzifikace úpravny vody Příkrý
Výstavba úpraven pitné vody
7
Ø4 in industry
Malá Skála -kanalizace a vodovod Vranové
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
30
Ø5 in industry
Zásobování pitnou vodou obce Tatobity - Žlábek včetně místních částí
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
12
Ø5 in industry
Dlouhodobý úvěr VHS Turnov
Bankovnictví
3
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

44%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
1 136,203,475
Vces a.s.
1 69,920,354
Lubomír Dvořák
1 45,992,438
Obis, spol. s r.o.
1 12,282,202
Českomoravská záruční a rozvojová banka, a.s.
1 9,123,833
Other suppliers 1 4,521,418

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (2 from 6)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 6)
Lots 0% (0 from 6)
E-auction 0% (0 from 6)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

92%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 17% (1 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 6)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

100%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 6)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 6)