Large cities • 2016

Město Nový Jičín

IČO 00298212

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..).

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

91%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Revitalizace sportovní haly a krytého bazénu v Novém Jičíně
Stavební práce
13
Ø5 in industry
Energetické úspory Nového Jičína - Základní škola Jubilejní 3
Stavba konstrukcí
12
Ø4 in industry
Energetická úspora Nového Jičína - ZŠ Jubilejní 3, pracoviště Dlouhá 56
Stavba konstrukcí
14
Ø4 in industry
www.novy-jicin.cz
Rozhlas, televize, komunikace, telekomunikace a související zařízení
3
Ø3 in industry
IPRM Nový Jičín - zóna sídliště Dlouhá, etapa ZŠ Dlouhá
Stavební úpravy chodníků
10
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

66%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Geosan Stavební a.s.
1 56,499,523
Bystroň Group a.s.
2 28,885,404
Nosta, s.r.o.
3 11,891,240
Strabag a.s.
3 10,645,275
Empemont s.r.o.
1 8,143,202
Other suppliers 24 39,794,174

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 0)
Lots 0% (0 from 0)
E-auction 0% (0 from 0)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

89%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 155,858,822
Unregulated purchases 42,986,965
Total 198,845,787

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

0%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 63%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0.27

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

23%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 34)
Final or estimated price not published 6% (2 from 34)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 34)
Missing supplier ID 6% (2 from 34)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 34)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 34)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 34)
Missing call for tenders 32% (11 from 34)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

3%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 64% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 3.82 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

75%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 34)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 34)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 34)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 34)
Supplier bankruptcy 3% (1 from 34)
Supplier donating to political party 9% (3 from 34)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 26% (9 from 34)