City parts • 2018 • past ranking

Městská část Praha 8

IČO 00063797

Buyer has seriously violated procurement law. Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

67%
average 42%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
"Revitalizace Karlínského náměstí"

15
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace parku a náměstí Krakov
Landscaping work for parks
8
Ø5 in industry
Stavba podzemních kontejnerových stání na celém území městské části Praha 8
Underground work other than tunnels, shafts and subways
1
Ø8 in industry
"Údržba zeleně - sečení trávy a hrabání listí"

6
Ø5 in industry
Dodávka mobilních kluzišť
Vans
2
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

76%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Gardenline s.r.o.
6 85,040,746
BYSTROŇ Group a.s.
4 26,583,317
Pražské služby, a.s.
1 25,586,565
Komwag, podnik čistoty a údržby města, a.s.
1 24,580,724
BaP holding a.s.
1 22,125,150
Other suppliers 27 100,011,337

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

69%
average 65%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 18% (3 from 17)
Nonprice competition 17% (4 from 23)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 23)
E-auction 13% (3 from 23)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 23)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

69%
average 88%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

51%
average 76%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 13%
Cancelled contracts 35%
Average requirements modifications count 0.22

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 4% (2 from 57)
Final or estimated price not published 23% (13 from 57)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 57)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 57)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 57)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 57)
Missing call for tenders 4% (2 from 57)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 57)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 57)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

27%
average 33%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 77% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.98 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 47 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders