City parts • 2016

Městská část Praha 3

IČO 00063517

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..).

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

55%
average 53%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Poskytování energetických služeb metodou EPC ve vybraných objektech v majetku Městské části Praha 3
Energetické a související služby
4
Ø3 in industry
MŠ V Zahrádkách - výstavba nového objektu
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
ZŠ V Zahrádkách – výstavba družiny
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
ZŠ a MŠ Chelčického, budova Žerotínova 36/1100 - rekonstrukce kuchyně II.
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce objektu ZŠ Cimburkova 18, Praha 3
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

85%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Enesa a.s.
1 50,687,973
Vw Wachal a.s.
2 39,978,451
B & J Holding,a.s.
2 36,344,177
Prominecon Cz a.s.
2 26,890,607
Vltavín Holding stavební podnik s.r.o.
1 25,696,477
Other suppliers 34 147,896,615

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

91%
average 81%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
„Sdružené služby dodávek elektrické energie pro Městskou část Praha 3“
Not disclosed
- 8,117,796

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

40%
average 67%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 29%
Cancelled contracts 13%
Average requirements modifications count 1.17

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

64%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 42)
Final or estimated price not published 5% (2 from 42)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 42)
Missing supplier ID 14% (6 from 42)
Missing buyer ID 2% (1 from 42)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 42)
Missing call for tenders 45% (19 from 42)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 42)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 42)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

75%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 42)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 42)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 42)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 42)
Supplier bankruptcy 2% (1 from 42)
Supplier donating to political party 10% (4 from 42)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 33% (14 from 42)