City parts • 2016

Městská část Praha 3

IČO 00063517

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..).

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

55%
average 53%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Poskytování energetických služeb metodou EPC ve vybraných objektech v majetku Městské části Praha 3
Energetické a související služby
4
Ø3 in industry
MŠ V Zahrádkách - výstavba nového objektu
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
ZŠ V Zahrádkách – výstavba družiny
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
ZŠ a MŠ Chelčického, budova Žerotínova 36/1100 - rekonstrukce kuchyně II.
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce objektu ZŠ Cimburkova 18, Praha 3
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

85%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Enesa a.s.
1 50,687,973
Vw Wachal a.s.
2 39,978,451
B & J Holding,a.s.
2 36,344,177
Prominecon Cz a.s.
2 26,890,607
Vltavín Holding stavební podnik s.r.o.
1 25,696,477
Other suppliers 34 147,896,615

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

91%
average 81%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
„Sdružené služby dodávek elektrické energie pro Městskou část Praha 3“
Not disclosed
8,117,796

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

40%
average 67%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 29%
Cancelled contracts 13%
Average requirements modifications count 1.17

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

64%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 42)
Final or estimated price not published 5% (2 from 42)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 42)
Missing supplier ID 14% (6 from 42)
Missing buyer ID 2% (1 from 42)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 42)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 42)
Missing call for tenders 45% (19 from 42)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

75%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 42)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 42)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 42)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 42)
Supplier bankruptcy 2% (1 from 42)
Supplier donating to political party 10% (4 from 42)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 33% (14 from 42)