Small cities • 2016

Město Česká Třebová

IČO 00278653

Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

71%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
REVITALIZACE, OBNOVA MĚSTSKÉ ZELENĚ A ROZVOJ PLOCH SÍDELNÍ ZELENĚ S CÍLEM ZLEPŠENÍ KVALITY ŽIVOTA
Služby vysazování a údržby zelených ploch
4
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení MŠ Vinohrady, Česká Třebová
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
CISTERNOVÁ AUTOMOBILOVÁ STŘÍKAČKA PRO JSDHO ČESKÁ TŘEBOVÁ
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
4
Ø2 in industry
Dodávka zemního plynu v rámci sdružených služeb dodávky zemního plynu pro město Česká Třebová a jeho příspěvkové organizace
Elektrická energie
neuveden
Ø4 in industry
Sdružené služby dodávky elektrické energie pro Město Česká Třebová
Elektrická energie
9
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

78%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
4 8,328,263
Pavel Haupt
1 5,712,192
G&g Building s.r.o.
1 5,629,045
Tht Polička, s.r.o.
1 5,050,000
Vemex Energie a.s.
1 4,510,250
Other suppliers 10 13,477,271

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 50% (1 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

64%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Dodávka zemního plynu v rámci sdružených služeb dodávky zemního plynu pro město Česká Třebová a jeho příspěvkové organizace
Not disclosed
4,510,250

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

49%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 6% (1 from 18)
Final or estimated price not published 39% (7 from 18)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 18)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 18)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 18)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 18)
Call and award notices contradict each other 6% (1 from 18)
Missing call for tenders 28% (5 from 18)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

90%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 18)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 17% (3 from 18)