Small cities • 2016

Město Nymburk

IČO 00239500

Good buyer. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad. Enough firms are competing for contracts.

37.
ranking
78%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

82%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
VZ-NBK-050-2012-02-Poskytování energetických služeb se zaručeným výsledkem v objektech města Nymburk
Energetické a související služby
6
Ø3 in industry
Stavební úpravy nemocnice Nymburk, pavilony B, C a D
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
Modernizace radiodiagnostického oddělení vč. digitalizace - Nemocnice Nymburk II.
Rentgenové přístroje
2
Ø2 in industry
VZ_NBK_051_2013_06 Zateplení objektu Poliklinika Okružní
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
VZ_NBK_051_2014_29 Zateplení objektu Poliklinika Okružní II
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

81%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
D-energy s.r.o.
1 39,355,185
František Miláček
2 30,462,261
Siemens, s.r.o.
1 21,303,226
Matex Hk s.r.o.
2 20,454,361
Cgm Czech a.s.
1 18,211,913
Other suppliers 17 79,275,923

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

64%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 9%
Average requirements modifications count 1.18

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

93%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 12% (3 from 24)
Final or estimated price not published 12% (3 from 24)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 24)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 24)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 24)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 24)
Missing call for tenders 17% (4 from 24)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 24)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 24)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

76%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 24)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 24)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 8% (2 from 24)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 24)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 24)
Supplier donating to political party 8% (2 from 24)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 29% (7 from 24)