Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Nymburk

IČO 00239500

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Enough firms are competing for contracts.

7.
ranking
79%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

65%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Stavební úpravy nemocnice Nymburk, pavilony B, C a D
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce objektu Hlahol Nymburk
Stavební úpravy školních budov
4
Ø5 in industry
RPS - Nymburk, Revitalizace panelového sídliště Drahelice - VI. etapa
Stavební práce
9
Ø5 in industry
RPS - Nymburk, Regenerace panelového sídliště Drahelice - IV. etapa – Rekonstrukce ulice Jurije Gagarina
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
9
Ø7 in industry
RPS - Nymburk, Revitalizace panelového sídliště Drahelice - V. etapa
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
9
Ø7 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

69%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
MATEX HK s.r.o.
3 47,841,426
František Miláček
1 23,961,511
BFK service a.s.
1 18,448,511
INEX Česká republika s.r.o.
2 13,728,000
Colsys s.r.o.
1 11,937,459
Other suppliers 12 32,883,028

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 305,126,805
Unregulated purchases 356,187,268
Total 661,314,072

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 6% (1 from 18)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 18)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 18)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 18)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 18)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 18)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 18)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 18)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

79%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 88% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.35 (average mistakes per contract)