Small cities • 2016

Město Horažďovice

IČO 00255513

The competition for contracts is high. There are not many contract extensions and ammendments.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

83%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce a revitalizace Mírového náměstí v Horažďovicích
Stavební práce
9
Ø5 in industry
Kulturní dům Horažďovice - zateplení objektu, výměna oken a dveří
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace
10
Ø4 in industry
Prácheňské marionety - oživlá lidová kultura
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Separace bioodpadů v DSO Horažďovicko
Kompostovače
2
Ø3 in industry
Otavská cyklostezka - úsek v mikroregionu Prácheňsko č.1 Svaté Pole - č.4 Zářečí, etapa I.
Výstavba cyklistických stezek
13
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

45%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Silnice Klatovy a.s.
2 40,594,484
Brick - Stav Cz a.s.
1 9,836,174
Stafis-kt s.r.o.
1 7,461,078
Elkoplast Cz, s.r.o.
1 4,322,900
Hanes s.r.o.
1 2,760,000
Other suppliers 7 9,608,845

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

58%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

78%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 8% (1 from 13)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 8% (1 from 13)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 13)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 13)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

75%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 13)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier bankruptcy 23% (3 from 13)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 38% (5 from 13)