Small cities • 2016

Město Frenštát pod Radhoštěm

IČO 00297852

The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

52%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
„Stavební úpravy Domu kultury ve Frenštátě pod Radhoštěm“
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Vybudování sběrného dvora ve Frenštátě pod Radhoštěm
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Modernizace a zateplení ZŠ Tyršova 913 ve Frenštátě pod Radhoštěm
Rekonstrukce budov
6
Ø5 in industry
„Stavební úpravy domu č. p. 1159 (CVČ Astra) ve Frenštátě pod Radhoštěm“
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace
3
Ø4 in industry
Celková oprava ZŠ Záhuní ve Frenštátě pod Radhoštěm
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

77%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Průmstav, a.s.
1 53,993,630
Turčina s.r.o.
3 20,948,447
Sewer s.r.o.
1 11,486,209
Bdstav Morava s.r.o.
1 10,314,114
Staseko Plus s.r.o.
2 10,151,115
Other suppliers 22 74,670,681

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 7)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 7)
E-auction 0% (0 from 7)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 7)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

85%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Celková oprava ZŠ Záhuní ve Frenštátě pod Radhoštěm
Dodatečné práce
- 2,808,990
Podchycení parapetu na mezipodestách domu č.p.346
Dodatečné práce
- 138,551
Vícepráce při realizaci projektu „Stavební úpravy domu č. p. 1159 (CVČ Astra) ve Frenštátě pod Radhoštěm“
Krajní naléhavost
- 64,990

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

61%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 8%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0.55

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

88%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 30)
Final or estimated price not published 20% (6 from 30)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 30)
Missing supplier ID 7% (2 from 30)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 30)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 30)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 30)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 30)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 30)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

78%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 30)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 30)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 3% (1 from 30)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 30)
Supplier bankruptcy 3% (1 from 30)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 30)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 27% (8 from 30)