Large cities • 2016

Statutární město Hradec Králové

IČO 00268810

Buyer profile has high number of errors. The competition for contracts is high.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

81%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Regenerace Benešovy třídy v Hradci Králové – 1. etapa - 2. část
Výstavba podzemních parkovišť
14
Ø5 in industry
Okružní křižovatka U Koruny v Hradci Králové
Stavební práce pro potrubní, telekomunikační a elektrické vedení
6
Ø4 in industry
Zajištění systému svozu rostlinné biomasy, komunitního kompostování, svozu odpadů z odpadkových košů a souvisejících činností
Sběr odpadu
3
Ø3 in industry
Rekonstrukce Bílé věže v Hradci Králové
Kamenické a zednické práce
8
Ø5 in industry
ZŠ M.Horákové - zateplení objektu a výměna oken
Stavební práce
10
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

84%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
S T A K O společnost s ručením omezeným
8 168,857,318
M - Silnice a.s.
3 121,314,826
Matex Hk s.r.o.
9 75,429,057
Bak stavební společnost, a.s.
5 55,488,560
Hradecké služby a.s.
1 50,199,826
Other suppliers 84 393,508,795

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

66%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 47% (14 from 30)
Nonprice competition 10% (3 from 30)
Lots 3% (1 from 30)
E-auction 3% (1 from 30)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

70%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 886,606,390
Unregulated purchases 914,681,271
Total 1,801,287,661

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

80%
average 77%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 5%
Cancelled contracts 13%
Average requirements modifications count 0.65

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

87%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 2% (2 from 110)
Final or estimated price not published 44% (48 from 110)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 110)
Missing supplier ID 13% (14 from 110)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 110)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 110)
Call and award notices contradict each other 2% (2 from 110)
Missing call for tenders 8% (9 from 110)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

2%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 4% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.81 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

69%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 1% (1 from 110)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 2% (2 from 110)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 4% (4 from 110)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 110)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 110)
Supplier donating to political party 21% (23 from 110)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 20% (22 from 110)