Small cities • 2016

Město Uničov

IČO 00299634

Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

47%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Základní škola Uničov, Pionýrů 685-energetická opatření
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
ZŠ U Stadionu Uničov - energetická opatření
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Sdružené služby dodávky zemního plynu pro město Uničov a jeho organizace
Zemní plyn
Not disclosed
Ø3 in industry
Energetická opatření v areálu Polikliniky Uničov
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Městské kulturní zařízení Uničov - energetická opatření
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

59%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Kareta s.r.o.
6 53,015,863
Vhh Thermont s.r.o.
3 44,933,000
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
1 12,361,929
Dach System s.r.o.
1 11,655,000
Pragoplyn, a.s.
1 6,247,008
Other suppliers 10 20,865,525

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

87%
average 64%

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

77%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Nákup zemního plynu MO na Komoditní burze PROFIT pro město Uničov a jeho příspěvkové organizace
Not disclosed
- 6,247,008
Nákup elektřiny NN pro město Uničov a jeho příspěvkové organizace
Not disclosed
- 2,098,525
Nákup elektřiny VN pro město Uničov a jeho příspěvkové organizace
Not disclosed
- 1,110,053

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

97%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.13

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

68%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 23% (5 from 22)
Final or estimated price not published 41% (9 from 22)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 22)
Missing supplier ID 9% (2 from 22)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 22)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 22)
Missing call for tenders 27% (6 from 22)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 22)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 22)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

91%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 22)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 22)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 22)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 22)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 22)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 22)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 27% (6 from 22)