Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Uničov

IČO 00299634

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

45%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Skupinový vodovod SOMU sever - 1. část
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
9
Ø7 in industry
Cyklostezka Uničov, m. č. Brníčko - Újezd
Výstavba vedlejších komunikací
12
Ø7 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti - ZŠ Haškova Uničov
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Cyklostezka Uničov, m. č. Nová Dědina - Šumvald
Výstavba cyklistických stezek
8
Ø5 in industry
RS – Uničov, mezi ulicemi Dukelská, Litovelská, Pionýrů – 1.etapa. Smíšené stezky pro chodce a cyklisty Uničov, MKZ – Litovelská, Nerudova
Výstavba cyklistických stezek
2
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

45%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
KARETA s.r.o.
5 68,955,000
FACTORY 2014 a.s.
1 15,440,000
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
1 12,361,929
VHH THERMONT s.r.o.
1 11,599,000
VHH THERMONT s.r.o.
1 8,990,000
Other suppliers 2 11,878,885

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 59%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

60%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 241,845,551
Unregulated purchases 428,123,391
Total 669,968,941

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

90%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 17% (2 from 12)
Final or estimated price not published 17% (2 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 12)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 8% (1 from 12)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)